Monday, July 13, 2015

Seriously? You're writing about this stuff?


Grumpy Cat
Usually when people say, "Seriously?" they're being a little sarcastic.

As in, "I can't believe s/he really said that."

Or, the person is surprised, shocked, taken aback, etc. and thinking, "OMG, I never KNEW that!"

Whether you are feeling sarcastic or stunned, welcome to "Seriously?"

I say that about a lot of things, lately.

Most recently, I say "Seriously?" about senior pictures.  I have a senior in high school this year.

School pictures totally suck, but senior pictures have those beat ten times over.

pinterest
If you're having these taken professionally, be prepared to pay through the nose. It's totally an investment, getting your child's senior photos done.

Prices in my area range from (the least expensive, smallest photo package) about $500 to (the most expensive) $1800.

Now, I realize that prices have gone up since I was in school back in the dinosaur age. However, senior photos shouldn't cost as much as my first used car and I shouldn't have to take out a personal loan in order to have my child's face memorialized on photo paper. Or canvas. Or tin. Or whatever other trendy thing is in for pictures to be printed upon.

I had considered staging a small-scale rebellion and encouraging everyone, via social media, to take their seniors to a studio such as Sears or JC Penney or WalMart for senior photos, but didn't think it would gain much ground.  I kind of wish it could happen though, but there are just too many parents who are willing to indulge their princesses (and princes - the photo packages/options for the boys are just as nauseating as the girls) and are willing to pay those prices.

Some people are handy with digital cameras and take beautiful photos. They don't require the services of a professional photographer. I am not one of those lucky people. If digital cameras had actual film, I would be the one exposing it.  Or taking the photo with my finger over the lens.

Adhttp://picturebrand.blogspot.com/2011/09/95-of
-worst-senior-portraits-of-all.htmld caption
I am aghast at the cost of senior photos.  They're beautiful pictures, quality work. But I don't really think my child needs a photo shoot like she's a runway model or something. What the hell, anyway?  Apparently, it is now a terrible thing to just have one pose for senior portraits, and one outfit and one hairstyle for said photo. One must now have a multitude of clothing changes, different scenes - live and local as well as studio locations, and include such props as golf clubs, french horns, horses, wiener dogs, and kayaks.

We are lucky enough to know someone who is willing to do us a huge favor by applying their professional skills to this task of senior photos. I'll be forever indebted to this kind person for easing the pain of the costly photo shoot.

Now - I'm trying to convince my daughter to wrangle the family cat for her portraits. Or maybe the lawn mower, or that pile of dirty laundry . . .

Seriously.



Slurpees are . . . nutritious?

crujonessociety.com
Our local 7-11  - or, "Sleven," in localese - has a self-serve Slurpee set-up in the back of the store. 

This is a wondrous thing.

yourfloridafriend.blogspot.com
Remember the days of waiting at the counter, ten people deep, for your Slurpee to be handed over?  Now, you can serve yourself, and not confuse the clerks over putting banana flavor on the bottom, followed by root beer, then orange, and topped off by a dollop of Mountain Dew.

So as  I was getting my Slurpee today, I notice a new sign taped up on the machines.  It reads something along the lines of: 1.  "If you're using an EBT card to pay for Slurpees, you must - something something something . . ." and then, 2. "Do not insert straw into Slurpee until you have paid and are out of the store."

 I was momentarily confused. I figured maybe the store was tired of people drinking half their Slurpees before they'd gotten to the counter to pay, so I asked the clerk, "What's an EBT card?"
dpss.lacounty.org

Clerk:  That's the food stamp card in this state.

me:  Oh, ok. So - the straw thing? We're a little confused.

forum.slowtwitch.com - Apu, of The Simpsons
Clerk: (tight lipped, looking put out) People on food stamps can now buy Slurpees with their foodstamp card.  If they put the straw in it before they pay and leave the store, then it's considered a 'to be consumed immediately' item and we can tax it.  If they use their EBT card and then put the straw in the Slurpee as soon as they're out the door, then it's not considered a 'to be consumed' food item, and it cannot be taxed.

me: Huh.  So - those banana-flavored Slurpees are really nutritious and necessary food items, like bread and milk and real bananas.

Clerk:  (nodding) You got it. And, you and I get to pay for people on food stamps to get their Slurpees.

blogs.courant.com
me:  Interesting.  So - who on earth decided that Slurpees should be covered by food stamp money?

Clerk:  No idea, but let me tell you, it's just wrong.

me: (preparing to leave) Wow.  Well, thanks for the explanation.

So, what do you think? Is it wrong to spend food stamp money on Slurpees, which have absolutely no nutritional value - much like some sugar-coated cereals I won't name - or is it acceptable?  Should people on food stamps be denied a simple pleasure in life like a Slurpee on a hot day simply because they're on food stamps and don't have any ready cash?



Halloween 2006: Throwing out the Trash

Ok, so it wasn't just me being a prude as I watched the kids file by in the hallway of my child's elementary school yesterday afternoon.

halloweencostumes4u.com
The children were dressed in typical Halloween fare (ghosts, Jedi knights, Darth Vader, witches, princesses, Ninjas (including the Teenage Mutant Turtle variety), a few grim reapers were on hand, baseball and other sports heroes).

The adults and their high school aides were dressed in orange and black or in a simple Halloween costume.

But one costume wearer couldn't help but catch everyone's eye as she marched down the hall next to the youngsters.
bizrate.com

Thankfully, the wearer of "Dorothy the Tramp from Oz" costume**, as I dubbed it, declined to wear her thigh-high stockings to an elementary school, but little else was left to the imagination.

And that was just the front view of the costume. Not only was the cup about to overfloweth from the neckline of the adult Dorothy outfit, but there was a tattoo snaking up from the breast of the wearer, which drew even more attention to the cleavage revealed from the skimpy neckline of the blouse.

The back view revealed a lacy hemline that barely skimmed the buttocks of the wearer--perhaps it extended an inch or two below the butt--

BUT I was hoping, as was one male observer nearby(though I expect it really would have been an answer to his prayers), that the wind wouldn't catch that skirt as she exited the building. I was hoping she wouldn't have to bend down to tie any shoelaces because I really didn't want to see if she was wearing the standard granny-white underwear or a thong or perhaps nothing.

Not that I wanted to look, but it was getting increasingly difficult to tear my eyes away as my mind was contemplating all of the appalling possibilities.

Other parents mentioned to the school secretary the tastelessness of the Dorothy from Oz costume. I can rest assured it wasn't just me thinking there was something amiss. The secretary cringed and told me that the wearer of the costume was a PARENT who had come in to help with the Halloween party.

Yikes.

wizardofozclothing.com
I think had that been my child's class I'd have asked the parent to go put on some clothes.

In true child form though, the kids were more entranced with Dorothy's huge shoes (see photo, below, and at right) than they were with any other part of the costume. ("Mama! That lady's not wearing a seat belt!" said the child, of the naked woman zooming by in her automobile. . . .)

While this particular Dorothy may have been welcome to tread the yellow brick road to any number of homes to trick or treat, it is my opinion that this particular Dorothy really didn't belong at school in that get-up.

And I also think it's kind of scary that a parent chose to wear that outfit to an elementary school Halloween party. Save it for the bedroom, honey, or for your no-kids allowed Halloween parties. I think, aside from a handful of fanaticists, this is one reason why schools ban Halloween costumes and resort to having "autumn parties" instead of "Halloween parties."

bizrate.com
I don't know. I'm sure the woman thought she looked quite nice, and thought the outfit really cute. And, it's a character from a children's story after all, so that makes it all right. But, let's examine the reality, here.

Here is the Adult Dorothy (bright blue, at right). The only differences from the "Teen" Dorothy  is that the adult Dorothy has a fitted waist line/bodice and thigh-high stockings.


bizrate.com, teen Dorothy
The Teen Dorothy has a looser bodice and waistline and (presumably) one-piece white tights, and a less-fitted skirt. Are the one-piece tights a bow to virginity, vs. the thigh-high stockings?

Otherwise, there isn't much to distinguish the "adult" costume from the "teen" costume. Which is rather shameful, unless you don't   mind your teen daughter looking like a stripper in training for an Over the Rainbow strip club.
costumes4less.com

It has been in the news recently that Halloween garb is getting a bit more. . . risque, and it doesn't seem that it's limited just to the adult set. As you can see from the outfits pictured here, the "teen" costumes are getting to be a bit skimpy as well. My sister remarked that a third-grade child at her school was dressed as a Geisha - with skimpy skirt and extremely high-heeled shoes. "Cute idea," she remarked, "but the costume was definitely too adult-looking for a kid that age."  The costume wasn't nearly as modest as the one pictured, here.

vintage 1970s devil at
goblinhaus.com
Does anybody remember when Halloween costumes were composed of whatever you had lying about the house? We used to feel sorry for the kids who had store-bought costumes -especially the ones that were like plastic bags and had the character and name of the character you were supposed to be dressed as, performing some heroic deed. Picture Spider Man in all his red and blue glory, splashed across the front of something equivalent to a kid-size white garbage bag, with his logo in big letters, scaling the side of a building while rescuing a kitten stranded on the rooftop. You get the idea. They really looked bad, bad, bad. Tsk.

komar.org
Halloween merchandise is a really big deal now, though, and people spend just as much on Halloween as they do on Christmas. Decorations, light and yard displays, and so of course, costumes must keep up with the Joneses as well. I have no complaint over the improvements made to store-bought costumes. But home-made ones can be just as nice, with a little bit of effort.

Maybe dressing as a hobo isn't  all the rage anymore -  our popular culture and the times have changed and hobos aren't  aound so much as homeless people, who I guess would be their counterparts in this day and age. Witches are still in vogue, as are princesses, grim reapers, and licensed characters such as Mickey Mouse and Super Man.

areyouinmyphoto.com
As a kid back home, admittedly reaching the dark ages now, our Halloween costumes consisted of a few basic pieces: black skirt, cape, dad's  old coveralls, old flowered fabric that often doubled as a cape for a gypsy, red kerchiefs pilfered from dad. Accessories were then added. Witch? Get a black hat and stripey socks. Hobo or bum? Smudge some dirt on that face and wear the coveralls and an old flannel shirt. Clown? Coveralls worked again, with colorful ruffles around ankles and wrists.

childparentingabout.com
I recall being a robot one year - tin foil and a box, and a mask were just fine. 

Ok, we weren't top-notch stage costume experts, perhaps, but we still had a lot of fun. And the majority of the kids who tricked & treated at our house were dressed in similar fashion.

I don't  object to an "upgrade" in costuming, I  just wish, much like the daily clothing that is considered in style these days, that kids could still be kids and not have to select a costume from something that is inappropriate for their ages. Certainly some of the costumes available are looking a little too sexual, and that really sends a mixed message when an adult purchases a costume that is too adult in looks and tone for their elementary aged daughter (or son).

free4allcity.com
There are those who object greatly to the dressing up of children in any costume be it scary or not, and asking for candy door-to-door. So let's  give them more ammunition to just outright cancel the day, shall we? Let's  continue to cave in to marketing and purchase sleazy costuming.

My son's preschool (about four years ago) was an entirely costume-free zone on Halloween. None of the kids minded,  they understood that  costumes were an after-school thing, and they were happy to have their party all the same. They indulged in the usual party games that school children do - they just do it without the costume.

After witnessing a few get-ups at my daughter's school, I'm thinking that costume-free Halloween school days are not a bad idea. Especially if the adults don't have enough sense to wear something appropriate.
gigaweb.com - Mistress Dorothy

electricboutique.com
Ok, my mind and eyes are done reeling from the assault they suffered that Halloween afternoon. But if you're not attending your kids' Halloween parades at school, you just have no idea what on earth you're missing! And if the trend toward risque costuming continues, I suspect attendance at elementary school Halloween parades won't be the only thing going up next year.




**May I add that the commentary here is just that. COMMENTARY. I do not know the person who wore this particular costume, and have no idea of what kind of morals and standards the costume wearer follows or possesses. The costume wearer may be the most moral and upright citizen for all I know. The commentary here is strictly my own OPINION and is not meant as an attack on any individual or group of individuals, tattooed or not. Tattoos can be beautiful expressions of individuality. I have no issue with tattoos. My "issue" is with appropriate dress, as regular readers of this space may already know.


Thank God nobody showed up like this, however:
yeselguapo.com
























More Monday Miscellaney


lolcats - icanhascheezburger.com
It's Monday, and I've got "It's Friday, I'm in Love," on the brain.  I guess this means it's time for more Monday Miscellaney.  Lucky you!



  • There's nothing like your pre-teen telling you the computer keyboard is frozen to start your day off right.  After a change of batteries, some messing around with clicking this button or that, running the virus scan and restarting the computer, the keyboard works again. Whew. Double whew. I'd be lost without the home computer.
  • I'm thinking Halloween is my favorite holiday, hands-down.  I mentioned to a relative last night that "We're getting ready for Halloween, here," and got the response, "WHAT? It's only October 3!"  That gave me pause for all of five seconds.  I'll blame it on having kids, though I suspect that even without the kids, I'd have gotten out the pumpkins and skeletons anyhow.  At least I waited until October 2nd to do it.  I like the costumes, the free candy (though, at my age, the candy isn't free anymore), and the decorations.  It's rather low-pressure, unlike Christmas.
  • It's weird to start seeing people you know in the obituary column who are your age.  This isn't a new phenomenon by any means, but it always takes one by surprise. 
  • Why is it that during 40-degree weather, I still see people wearing flip flops? Seriously? I can't wait until snowfall.  Wonder how many will be losing toes to frostbite.
  •  
    totalfilm.com
    "MY TOES! MY TOES! Why didn't
    I wear my fur-lined boots?"
  • I feel privileged to help serve Mass at our local parish.  My family is on the schedule once a month.  For the last 6 weeks, however, we've not only served on our scheduled date and time, but also been pinch-hitting for others who don't bother to show up, let alone arrange for a substitute.  My husband has lately taken to asking me, "Are you scheduled to do anything, this time?" My response is usually, "No," which he quickly follows up with, "Yeah, until you get there."  Then he stifles snickers of "I told you so," when someone taps my shoulder and says, "Can you fill in, today?"  I really don't mind - except that I'm starting to feel resentful toward those who are finding it impossible to fulfill their commitment.  To them, I'd like to say, "You signed on for this.  It is one hour, one weekend, per month.  If you can't fulfill the duty, then ask to be taken off the schedule, and until that happens, find someone to fill in for you.  You aren't the only person who might like to sit with their family now and then during a church service.  It is extremely rude and inconsiderate of you to skip out when you know you're scheduled, and then when you do show up, it's within two minutes of start time - leaving everyone to wonder if you'll even be here.  You can do better than that!"
  •  
    thegreenhead.com
    peanut butter & jelly spreader
  • Wow, but I'm tired of fundraisers.  Every year, our school does the same fundraiser. In my opinion, the catalog is full of stuff that could be purchased elsewhere, and for less. For example, those handy suction-cup containers you can stick in the shower - the catalog had them for $2.00 more than the local Meijer.  The chocolates look mouth wateringly delicious until you get them.  Then, you discover they're all about the size of a fifty-cent piece and 2/3 of the box is raised cardboard with the chocolates artfully spread on top of that to make the container look like it's brimming with sweetness.  And I really need to spend $7.50 on a "peanut butter & jelly spreader."  I'm thinking most of this stuff probably comes from the Lillian Vernon catalog to begin with.
  • Excuses, excuses. I do feel badly, sometimes, when kids tell me they've lost an important piece of homework, or that they couldn't do the homework because they were being shuffled here and there, often at the parent's whim and will, and no one had time to sit down and help with the work.  Other times, it's generally a case of the kid being extremely disorganized and sitting in front of the computer or video games instead of prioritizing what really  needs to be done.
  •  
    sweetcatastrophecakes.blogspot.com
  • At what grade, in school, do you remember the teacher having to tell the class, "In order to get a birthday treat, you need to be seated at your desk and not swarming Alfred.  I expect to hear a 'thank you' to Alfred when he brings your treat to you."  Now, I'm not so old as to believe that my elementary school days are filled with rosy-cheeked, well-behaved children.  I'm sure we were little monsters at times - in fact, I know we were.  But - I seriously don't recall my teachers ever telling us to be seated at birthday treat time. I don't think most of us dared to swarm the birthday kid, hoping to pick over each decorated cupcake in hopes of getting the one with the most frosting.  Really, kids?  You're ten and eleven years old now. What happened to manners?
  •  
    makeupadviceforum.com
  • Of course, what can I expect when I see what's left in the staff room of the rolls from a meeting.  Someone took out the center part of the roll and left the rest in the box.  My reaction was laughing disbelief: This is something we'd do to each other, at home, I thought - recalling the days when my brothers would say, as one of us eyed that last piece of pie or cake, "That's mine - I spit on it."
  • That lipstick you were so happy to find that cost $1.99?  It's going to go on your lips like $1.99, too.  Ever try to color your lips with crayon? Not even a Crayola, but one of those generic off-brand crayons? That's what $1.99 lipstick is like. Don't waste your money.  On the other hand, if the lipstick is $1.99 because it's been marked down from $12.00 or something, stock up.
  • While I'm on the subject of lipstick, why is it when I look at the wide array of colors available I end up purchasing something nearly the same shade as what I have at home? I guess I'm just meant to wear one shade of lipstick.
  • Where art thou, 2 yards of black lace? I've searched high and low for this lace now that I want it for a Halloween costume, and do you think I can find it?  Just my luck, I'll find it November 1st.

Kids: Life's Great Paradox

More accurately, the title should read, "Kids: Our attitude toward them is paradoxical." Is paradoxical even a word?

    
    thundafunda.com
  • We can't wait to have children.  Then, we have them.  To paraphrase Shrek,  "They poop and they cry and they cry when they poop and they eat and they cry and they cry when they eat and then they poop some more. . ." and we say, "Man, I can't wait until this kid is potty trained and sleeps through the night." 
  • When the kids were potty trained, it was like getting a pay raise.  When they slept through the night, we still woke up at 3 a.m. and would tiptoe into the bedroom and make sure they were still breathing.
  •  
    andyspiders.com
  • We love holding the babies.  They're small, cherubic, warm, snuggly.  And we say, "Holy cow, I can't wait until this kid is old enough to walk because my back is killing me from carrying him/her all over, wherever we go."  Then, the kid learns to walk and we wish for a way to corral him so he stays out of mischeif.
  •  
    gmhightechperformance.com
  • At first, we're so thrilled to see and own every piece of baby paraphernelia known to mankind.  Then, as baby grows, we say, "This crap is expensive! What do we need that for?" And you buy it anyway.  You say, "I can't wait until they outgrow this stuff and we don't have to buy it anymore."
  • Then, we discover by around age sixteen, the price of the kid's toys has gone up considerably.
  •  
    youngadults.about.com
  • Our kids drive us crazy, we think, and we say we can't wait until the move out of the house.  No more waiting up nights, wondering if they're all right while they're out with their friends.  No more hollering, "Turn down that music!" or "Take out the trash!" or "Did you do your homework?"  Then, the kids are off to college, or moving out "for good," and suddenly we wish they were home, again.
  •  
    maternitybykoren.com
  • We say, "Just wait until you have kids of your own," because we feel we are superior in our knowledge that our own kids will be driven absolutely crazy like we were.  We say, "I hope you have a kid just. . . like. . . yourself." And we mean it, for every time our kids were sullen, snotty, sweet, caring, kind, wise. . ." And then, our kids have kids and suddenly we feel old - because we're grandparents, and in holding that grandchild, we suddenly remember what it was like to hold our own for the very first time - and how we were so thrilled to have that new life.  And then we remember that it's time for the 3 a.m. feeding and we say, "They poop and they cry and they cry when the poop. . ."
As my daughter said to me the other day, "What is it with grown ups? One day they want us to be babies, and the next day they want us to be grown up."

I said, "Just wait until you have kids of your own."

School pictures suck

If today were Friday, I'd call this post The Friday Fumbles.

As it stands, it's only Thursday - and Thursday morning, at that.

My mind is empty of any rational thought.

Instead, there are a jillion things roaming around my brain, colliding and trying to make some sort of sense.  I'm sure all of us have days like that, and it's not just me.

All I can think of right now are school pictures.  That's a bad thing.

School pictures have got to be one of the worst forms of torture known to mankind.  Our school photos have been sent home within the last day or two, and I must say, they are truly horrific.  Being employed at a school, I am required to have a photo identification card.


chicagodancesingles.com

I dutifully wait in line for my turn at the camera.  Gone are the days when you'd sit on the stool with your head turned one way, torso another, and from the waist down pointing yet another direction.  Now, there are paper feet to stand on - remniscent of those old "Learn to dance" cut-out feet.

And, the head&shoulders pose is now passe. Along with the new, cut-out feet, we are subjected to the 3/4 body shot. From about waist up, hands folded demurely, this pose shows every bulge and clothing wrinkle you possess.


Grandpa Simpson

No one can possibly be more adept at making your 4th grader look stoned, the most attractive person look like they got hit by a Mack truck, the least attractive person look even more unattractive, find the wimpiest poses, the most age-inappropriate poses - capturing into infinity the way we weren't back in "dickety-two" (as Grandpa Simpson would say).

Here are some yearbook photo gems to help us tip our hats to the School Photographer.

 Let no child be left behind from the pain of school photos.


bodybuilding.com
Looks like something from
the set of "Saved by the Bell."

huffingtonpost.com
Mug shot, mayhap? Well, at
least he looks happy.

ebaumsworld.com
Mirror, Mirror, in my hand
This is the weirdest pose in the land.


current.com
No, wait. THIS is the weirdest
pose in the land.
huffingtonpost.com
Reminds me of "Meathead" from All in the Family.






tvguide.com
Meathead, All in the Family




badyearbookphotos.com
Don't mess with her - not only can she bake that
cherry pie, Billy Boy, she can whup your ass, too.



buzzfeed.com
Yep. Another photo of some innocent
girl looking stoned out of her mind.

huffingtonpst.com
What the hell?



awfulyearbook.com
The web site title says it all.




huffingtonpost.com
I loved the 1980s, and would have (possibly) killed
to have hair that looked like this every day.


huffingtonpost.com
Huffington Post dubbed this photo "Eat my Shorts." Seems
appropriate.  I feel kind of bad for the guy, though, being immortalized
this way because nobody insisted he go to picture re-take day.
Oh. Maybe this IS the retake.

 
badyearbookphotos.com
He doesn't just *look* stoned, he probably is.

badyearbookphotos.com
I like a guy who knows how to dress up.
I'm betting it was the photographer who
was stoned during this take, though.